R v Spicer; Foster, Ex p [1958] HCA 8

R v Spicer; Foster, Ex p [1958] HCA 8

The provisions now standing as Pt. IX were intended to be cumulative upon, and not substitutional for, the jurisdiction now contained in s. 141. Part IX, although concerned with elections, has a wider and different ambit, while s. 141 enforces compliance with organisational rules. Accordingly Pt. IX did not impliedly whittle down or restrict s. 141, and the objection to Dunphy J.'s order did not justify prohibition.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application to Make Absolute an Order Nisi for a Writ of Prohibition / Return of Order Nisi Granted by Mc Tiernan J.
Outcome
Order nisi discharged.
Legal Topics
['writ of Prohibition' 'registered Organisations' 'disputed Elections' 'statutory Construction' 'conciliation and Arbitration Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Make Absolute an Order Nisi for a Writ of Prohibition / Return of Order Nisi Granted by Mc Tiernan J.

  1. 1 ['Whether, after the enactment of the provisions now standing as Pt. IX of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1956, s. 141 should be construed as enabling the Commonwealth Industrial Court to make an order concerning the validity of an election of officers of a registered organisation.' 'Whether additional grounds proposed for inclusion in the order nisi disclosed a proper case for the issue of a writ of prohibition.']

Ratio Decidendi

The provisions now standing as Pt. IX were intended to be cumulative upon, and not substitutional for, the jurisdiction now contained in s. 141. Part IX, although concerned with elections, has a wider and different ambit, while s. 141 enforces compliance with organisational rules. Accordingly Pt. IX did not impliedly whittle down or restrict s. 141, and the objection to Dunphy J.'s order did not justify prohibition.

Court Disposition

Order nisi discharged.

Orders

  • ['Order nisi discharged.' 'Costs of the application to be paid by the prosecutors.']