WSDC Box Hill Primitus Development Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1764
The modification application is permissible as the development (subject to agreed amendments and conditions) remains substantially the same as originally consented, complies with all statutory and environmental planning requirements, and the agreement reached by the parties is within the Court’s jurisdiction to approve.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Disposition Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Disposition Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether modification application DA 846/2016/JP/A complies with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and relevant planning instruments' 'Whether development as modified is substantially the same as the original consent' 'Compliance with water quality, stormwater, and biodiversity targets under State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021' 'Compliance with design quality principles under SEPP 65 and EPA Regulation' 'Bushfire safety considerations under Rural Fires Act 1997']
Ratio Decidendi
The modification application is permissible as the development (subject to agreed amendments and conditions) remains substantially the same as originally consented, complies with all statutory and environmental planning requirements, and the agreement reached by the parties is within the Court’s jurisdiction to approve.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification application DA 846/2016/JP/A for erection of residential flat complex at 13 Terry Road, Box Hill, is modified as per Annexure A.' 'Terms of consolidated Development Consent No DA 846/2016/JP are set out in Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment