Weng v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 3) [2011] FCA 654
The appeal was allowed on a new ground of jurisdictional error raised late; the orders granted included quashing the Tribunal’s decision and remitting the matter for reconsideration. The appropriate costs order was for the Minister to pay two-thirds of Mr Weng’s appeal costs, given the main success was on the late-added ground, but other unsuccessful grounds were not wasteful.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal committed jurisdictional error' 'Appropriate relief following successful appeal' 'Appropriate costs order given partial success and late raising of ground']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed on a new ground of jurisdictional error raised late; the orders granted included quashing the Tribunal’s decision and remitting the matter for reconsideration. The appropriate costs order was for the Minister to pay two-thirds of Mr Weng’s appeal costs, given the main success was on the late-added ground, but other unsuccessful grounds were not wasteful.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['The appeal be allowed.' 'A writ of certiorari issue to quash the decision of the second respondent made on 29 January 2010.' 'A writ of mandamus issue directing the second respondent to consider the application according to law.' 'A writ of prohibition issue restraining the first respondent from acting, or giving...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment