Wy Trading Pty Ltd v Wang [2012] NSWADT 190

Wy Trading Pty Ltd v Wang [2012] NSWADT 190

The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction under the Retail Leases Act 1994 to hear a dispute relating to premises used as a brothel, as brothels are not included in the businesses listed in Schedule 1, and are not encompassed by the expression 'amusement and entertainment services.'

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Application / Jurisdictional Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Each party to bear its own costs.
Legal Topics
['jurisdiction' 'retail Leases' 'statutory Interpretation' 'costs']
['administrative Law' 'property Law'] ['jurisdiction' 'retail Leases' 'statutory Interpretation' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Jurisdictional Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under the Retail Leases Act 1994 to hear a dispute involving premises used as a brothel' "Whether a brothel is covered under 'retail shop' in the Retail Leases Act 1994, specifically Schedule 1 businesses" 'Whether costs should be awarded']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction under the Retail Leases Act 1994 to hear a dispute relating to premises used as a brothel, as brothels are not included in the businesses listed in Schedule 1, and are not encompassed by the expression 'amusement and entertainment services.'

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • ['The Application is dismissed.' 'Each party is to bear its own costs of the proceedings.']