Wyong Shire Council v MCC Energy (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 196
Because MCC was the respondent to an appeal in which the appellant Council was partially successful and the appeal was allowed in part, the power to grant a certificate under s 6 of the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 was enlivened. It was appropriate to grant the certificate despite there being no order that MCC pay the Council's costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Costs; Application for Indemnity Certificate Under Suitor's Fund Act 1951 / Notice of Motion Determined on Papers After Appeal Allowed in Part
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Certificate' "suitor's Fund" 'partially Successful Appeal' 'each Party to Pay Own Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs; Application for Indemnity Certificate Under Suitor's Fund Act 1951 / Notice of Motion Determined on Papers After Appeal Allowed in Part
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the first respondent was entitled to an indemnity certificate under s 6 of the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 where the appeal was allowed in part and each party was ordered to pay its own costs."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because MCC was the respondent to an appeal in which the appellant Council was partially successful and the appeal was allowed in part, the power to grant a certificate under s 6 of the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 was enlivened. It was appropriate to grant the certificate despite there being no order that MCC pay the Council's costs.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion granted.
Orders
- ["The first respondent be granted a certificate under s 6 of the Suitor's Fund Act 1951 if otherwise qualified."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment