WZAQR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCAFC 122
The Assessor dealt with the claim that the appellant would be persecuted as a failed asylum seeker and made findings on the likelihood of harm which encompassed any risk arising both in outcome and process, implicitly including investigation upon return. No legal error or jurisdictional error was established as the facts did not support a real chance of serious harm.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugees Convention' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Independent Protection Assessor failed to consider an integer of the appellant's claims" 'Whether the Assessor asked the wrong legal question' "Whether there was legal error in the Assessor's assessment of the risk of persecution upon return to Iran"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Assessor dealt with the claim that the appellant would be persecuted as a failed asylum seeker and made findings on the likelihood of harm which encompassed any risk arising both in outcome and process, implicitly including investigation upon return. No legal error or jurisdictional error was established as the facts did not support a real chance of serious harm.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["The name of the first respondent be amended to 'Minister for Immigration and Border Protection'." 'The appeal be dismissed, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment