WZASS v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 673
Because the Federal Circuit Court refused the appellant's application for an extension of time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476A(3) of that Act precluded any appeal to the Federal Court from that judgment. The Federal Court therefore had no jurisdiction to determine the appeal, so the notice of objection to competency was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From Refusal by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia to Extend Time for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision; Notice of Objection to Competency
- Outcome
- Notice of objection to competency upheld; appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of today assessed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa Refusal' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review Time Limits' 'competency of Appeal' 'jurisdiction of the Federal Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From Refusal by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia to Extend Time for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision; Notice of Objection to Competency
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a Federal Circuit Court judgment refusing to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the Minister's notice of objection to competency should be upheld."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Federal Circuit Court refused the appellant's application for an extension of time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476A(3) of that Act precluded any appeal to the Federal Court from that judgment. The Federal Court therefore had no jurisdiction to determine the appeal, so the notice of objection to competency was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Notice of objection to competency upheld; appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of today assessed if not agreed.
Orders
- ['The notice of objection to competency be upheld.' 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant to pay the first respondent's costs of today assessed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment