X v Y [2000] NSWSC 951
Given that the first defendant is a participant in a witness protection program and disclosure poses risks to her safety, the interests of justice require the proceedings be held in private and non-publication orders be made under the Court's statutory and inherent powers.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: X; First Defendant: Mrs Y as Adminstratrix of Estate of Late Mr Y; Second Defendant: Lawhouse Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Registrar General
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Hearing in Private and Non Publication
- Outcome
- Orders made that the proceedings be held in private and subject to non-publication.
- Legal Topics
- Proceedings in Absence of Public, Witness Protection in Civil Proceedings, Suppression of Publication, Jurisdiction and Discretion of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X
Plaintiff
Mrs Y as Adminstratrix of Estate of Late Mr Y
First Defendant
Lawhouse Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Registrar General
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Orders Regarding Hearing in Private and Non Publication
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proceedings should be held in private due to a party's participation in a witness protection program
- 2 Whether non-publication orders should be made regarding the identity of parties, evidence, and the nature of the orders
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the first defendant is a participant in a witness protection program and disclosure poses risks to her safety, the interests of justice require the proceedings be held in private and non-publication orders be made under the Court's statutory and inherent powers.
Court Disposition
Orders made that the proceedings be held in private and subject to non-publication.
Orders
- Order that these proceedings be held in private.
- Order that there be no publication of: (a) the fact that a party is a participant in a witness protection program; (b) the names of the parties or associated police officers; (c) the making of this order; (d) the evidence in these proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment