X-Sealant Pty Ltd v Burwood Council [2024] NSWLEC 1452
Because the amended modification application complied with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, was made under s 4.55(1A), was of minimal environmental impact, resulted in a development quantitatively and qualitatively substantially the same as the originally approved development, required no concurrence consultation, was notified with no submissions received, and no relevant s 4.15(1) matters precluded approval, the Court was satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that it could make the agreed decision and was required to dispose of the proceedings accordingly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Concerning an Application to Modify Development Consent Da/10.2017.124.1 / Orders Made Following a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; leave granted to rely on the amended development application; development consent modified by approval of Modification Application 10.2017.124.6.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'class 1 Appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'communal Open Space Design Amendments' 'mixed Use Development' 'floor Space Ratio' 'state Environmental Planning Policy (housing) 2021' 'basix']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Concerning an Application to Modify Development Consent Da/10.2017.124.1 / Orders Made Following a Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders giving effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the modification application satisfied s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, including minimal environmental impact and substantially the same development.' 'Whether relevant matters under ss 4.55(3) and 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 precluded approval of the modification application.' 'Whether the proposed modification remained permissible and acceptable under Burwood Local Environmental Plan 2012 and relevant State environmental planning policies.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the amended modification application complied with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, was made under s 4.55(1A), was of minimal environmental impact, resulted in a development quantitatively and qualitatively substantially the same as the originally approved development, required no concurrence consultation, was notified with no submissions received, and no relevant s 4.15(1) matters precluded approval, the Court was satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that it could make the agreed decision and was required to dispose of the proceedings accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; leave granted to rely on the amended development application; development consent modified by approval of Modification Application 10.2017.124.6.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended development application as listed at [7] in the judgment.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent No. 10.2017.124.1 is modified in the terms in Annexure A by the approval of Modification Application 10.2017.124.6.' 'Development consent No....
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment