X v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1469
The application was dismissed because the applicant's submissions challenged factual findings made by the Tribunal, and he did not advance any review ground of the kind enumerated in s 476 of the Migration Act that would permit the Court to intervene.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; non-publication order made; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'migration Act S 476' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'ethiopia' 'amhara' 'all Amhara People Organization']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant advanced a ground of review of the kind enumerated in s 476 of the Migration Act.' "Whether the Court could review the Tribunal's factual findings about the applicant's fear of persecution for political opinion or race."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant's submissions challenged factual findings made by the Tribunal, and he did not advance any review ground of the kind enumerated in s 476 of the Migration Act that would permit the Court to intervene.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; non-publication order made; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "From henceforth the applicant's name not be published or communicated other than to those employed by the Minister for official purposes." 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment