X and Y (by her Tutor X) v PAL (On question of costs) [1991] NSWCA 302
Given appellants' success on most issues, absence of offer of compromise by respondents, and the complexity and necessity to bring the case, justice requires appellants receive 50% of their pretrial and trial costs, rather than full victory or reversal.
- Parties
- Appellant: X; Appellant: Y (by her Tutor X); Respondent: PAL
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment
- Outcome
- Appellants awarded 50% of their costs of trial and pretrial procedures.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Offers of Compromise, Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X
Appellant
Y (by her Tutor X)
Appellant
PAL
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What order as to costs should be made following final judgment
- 2 Appropriateness of applying normal rule that costs follow the event considering success on some and failure on other issues
- 3 Relevance of offer of compromise procedures to costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Given appellants' success on most issues, absence of offer of compromise by respondents, and the complexity and necessity to bring the case, justice requires appellants receive 50% of their pretrial and trial costs, rather than full victory or reversal.
Court Disposition
Appellants awarded 50% of their costs of trial and pretrial procedures.
Orders
- Each of the appellants to receive 50 per cent of the pretrial costs of their respective actions.
- The appellants to receive 50 per cent of the costs of the trial (the appellants to be treated as one party for this purpose).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment