Luo v Zhai (No 3) [2015] FCA 5
The Court granted leave for the applicant to commence proceedings in the United Kingdom for a freezing order against third parties, applying the principles in Dadourian Group International Inc v Simms. The judge was satisfied that the grant of leave was just and convenient for protecting the Court’s jurisdiction, evidence of dissipation existed, and any prejudice to the third parties was outweighed by prejudice to the applicant if leave were refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Post Trial, Interlocutory Application for Leave
- Outcome
- Leave granted to applicant to seek freezing orders in the United Kingdom.
- Legal Topics
- ['freezing Orders' 'leave to Commence Proceedings in Foreign Jurisdiction' 'undertakings' 'applications for Injunctions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Trial, Interlocutory Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant should be granted leave to commence proceedings in the United Kingdom seeking freezing orders against third parties pursuant to an undertaking not to do so without the Court's leave" 'Whether the Court should release the applicant from his undertaking to not seek similar orders overseas']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted leave for the applicant to commence proceedings in the United Kingdom for a freezing order against third parties, applying the principles in Dadourian Group International Inc v Simms. The judge was satisfied that the grant of leave was just and convenient for protecting the Court’s jurisdiction, evidence of dissipation existed, and any prejudice to the third parties was outweighed by prejudice to the applicant if leave were refused.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to applicant to seek freezing orders in the United Kingdom.
Orders
- ['Leave be granted to the applicant to seek in the United Kingdom a freezing order against the first respondent, Mr Dongsheng Li and Ms Susie Li to the extent that leave is necessary.' 'Costs be reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment