Lu v The Owners - Strata Plan No 66347 [2025] NSWCATAP 2
The Appeal Panel was not satisfied there were special circumstances under s 60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) to justify awarding costs to OSP66347. None of the alleged conduct by Ms Lu established special circumstances. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs as per the default position in s 60(1).
- Parties
- Appellant: Xiao Chun Lu; First Respondent: The Owners - Strata Plan No 66347; Second Respondent: Zhi Peng Zhang
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Costs Determination Following Withdrawal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs application dismissed; each party to pay own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Applications, Special Circumstances Under Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, Withdrawal of Proceedings, Legal Representation, Strata Management Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Xiao Chun Lu
Appellant
The Owners - Strata Plan No 66347
First Respondent
Zhi Peng Zhang
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Costs Determination Following Withdrawal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are special circumstances warranting an award of costs under s 60(2) of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
- 2 Whether Ms Lu's conduct constituted special circumstances
- 3 Assessment of party conduct following withdrawal of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel was not satisfied there were special circumstances under s 60(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) to justify awarding costs to OSP66347. None of the alleged conduct by Ms Lu established special circumstances. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs as per the default position in s 60(1).
Court Disposition
Costs application dismissed; each party to pay own costs.
Orders
- A hearing of the costs application of the first respondent is dispensed with.
- The costs application of the first respondent is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment