R v Liu [2022] NSWSC 1030
The charged reckless wounding offence was not a show cause offence because s 16B(1)(d)(i) of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) applies only to the listed serious indictable offences that involve the use of a firearm, which was not the case here. Applying the unacceptable risk test, the Court found that any risks could be addressed by conditions and were not unacceptable, so bail should be granted on conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Release Application Before Local Court Hearing
- Outcome
- Bail granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['release Application' 'reckless Wounding' 'show Cause Offence' 'unacceptable Risk Test' 'bail Conditions' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Release Application / Supreme Court Release Application Before Local Court Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether reckless wounding under s 35(4) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) was a show cause offence under s 16B(1)(d)(i) of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).' 'Whether the applicant presented any unacceptable risk under the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).' 'Whether bail should be granted with conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The charged reckless wounding offence was not a show cause offence because s 16B(1)(d)(i) of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) applies only to the listed serious indictable offences that involve the use of a firearm, which was not the case here. Applying the unacceptable risk test, the Court found that any risks could be addressed by conditions and were not unacceptable, so bail should be granted on conditions.
Court Disposition
Bail granted with conditions.
Orders
- ['Bail granted with conditions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment