In the matter of XSRE Pty Ltd - XSRE Pty Ltd v Lightning Electrical Group Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1147
The application was dismissed because XSRE Pty Ltd did not establish a genuine offsetting claim. The alleged claim depended on assertions about a mid-July 2010 commencement and early September 2010 opening that were contradicted by contemporaneous documents showing that plans were not finalised until late August and continued to be amended. The evidence as to causation of delay and quantum of alleged loss was largely assertion and did not provide sufficient material to calculate an offsetting total under s 459H(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Ss 459 G and 459 H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'judgment Debt' 'security of Payment Adjudication Certificate' 'breach of Contract' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'quantification of Unliquidated Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Ss 459 G and 459 H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether XSRE Pty Ltd had a genuine offsetting claim for the purposes of s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the alleged offsetting claim exceeded the judgment debt claimed in the statutory demand.' 'Whether XSRE Pty Ltd provided sufficient evidence of the basis and quantum of the alleged offsetting claim to permit the calculation required by s 459H(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because XSRE Pty Ltd did not establish a genuine offsetting claim. The alleged claim depended on assertions about a mid-July 2010 commencement and early September 2010 opening that were contradicted by contemporaneous documents showing that plans were not finalised until late August and continued to be amended. The evidence as to causation of delay and quantum of alleged loss was largely assertion and did not provide sufficient material to calculate an offsetting total under s 459H(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Dismiss the application to set aside the statutory demand, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment