Wang v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1782
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended proposal, subject to agreed conditions, addresses all statutory, heritage, biodiversity, and local planning requirements; public and technical objections are resolved by amendments and conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Xuenan Wang; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Development Application / Conciliation Conference and Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Heritage Protection, Biodiversity Conservation, Environmental Impact, Earthworks, Local Planning, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Xuenan Wang
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Development Application / Conciliation Conference and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amended development application meets statutory and local planning requirements
- 2 Heritage impacts under Heritage Act 1977
- 3 Biodiversity impacts and mitigation under Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended proposal, subject to agreed conditions, addresses all statutory, heritage, biodiversity, and local planning requirements; public and technical objections are resolved by amendments and conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development consent is granted to development application DA0114/23 for construction of a two-storey home, pool and tennis court including landscaping at 3 Graham Avenue, Pymble (Lot 8 DP 1291190), subject to conditions annexed as 'Annexure A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment