Momand v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited [2023] NSWSC 1014
The delegate's decision was set aside because the application for review of the Medical Assessment Certificate was, on proper construction, lodged within time and the delegate erred in law by failing to deal with this issue and by not engaging with grounds that the assessment was incorrect in a material respect, particularly misapplication of the statutory definition of minor injury and failure to give adequate reasons for the classification. Clause 5.9 of the Guidelines cannot override the clear statutory definition. The matter must be remitted for determination according to law.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yama Momand; First Defendant: CIC Allianz Insurance Limited; Second Defendant: Ian Cameron (in his capacity as a medical assessor); Third Defendant: Tajan Baba (in his capacity as the President's Delegate); Fourth Defendant: President of the Personal Injury Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Post Hearing, Judgment and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Delegate's decision set aside; matter remitted; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Adequacy of Reasons, Medical Assessment Certificate, Statutory Interpretation, Ultra Vires, Extension of Time, Motor Accident Injuries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yama Momand
Plaintiff
CIC Allianz Insurance Limited
First Defendant
Ian Cameron (in his capacity as a medical assessor)
Second Defendant
Tajan Baba (in his capacity as the President's Delegate)
Third Defendant
President of the Personal Injury Commission
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Hearing, Judgment and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Assessor failed to give adequate reasons for classifying the applicant's injuries as minor injuries
- 2 Whether the Assessor misapplied statutory definitions under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)
- 3 Whether Clause 5.9 of the Medical Assessment Guidelines is ultra vires
Ratio Decidendi
The delegate's decision was set aside because the application for review of the Medical Assessment Certificate was, on proper construction, lodged within time and the delegate erred in law by failing to deal with this issue and by not engaging with grounds that the assessment was incorrect in a material respect, particularly misapplication of the statutory definition of minor injury and failure to give adequate reasons for the classification. Clause 5.9 of the Guidelines cannot override the clear statutory definition. The matter must be remitted for determination according to law.
Court Disposition
Delegate's decision set aside; matter remitted; costs reserved.
Orders
- The delegate's decision dated 13 October 2022 is set aside.
- The matter is remitted to the President of the Personal Injury Commission to be dealt with according to law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment