Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Burrup Holdings Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 1304
The confidentiality orders should be continued, but limited to redacted portions of affidavits and documents containing confidential financial, financing, and settlement information, as it is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice under s 50; the remainder of the affidavits and documents can be made available for inspection by non-parties.
- Parties
- Applicant: Yara Australia Pty Ltd ACN 076 301 221; First Respondent: Burrup Holdings Limited ACN 097 138 353; Second Respondent: Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd ACN 095 441 151
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Continuation of Confidentiality Orders / Interlocutory Order (application Determined on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Confidentiality orders continued in a more limited form, with redactions required for confidential portions of affidavits and documents.
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality Orders, Open Justice, Federal Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yara Australia Pty Ltd ACN 076 301 221
Applicant
Burrup Holdings Limited ACN 097 138 353
First Respondent
Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd ACN 095 441 151
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Continuation of Confidentiality Orders / Interlocutory Order (application Determined on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether continued confidentiality orders are necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice pursuant to s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The confidentiality orders should be continued, but limited to redacted portions of affidavits and documents containing confidential financial, financing, and settlement information, as it is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice under s 50; the remainder of the affidavits and documents can be made available for inspection by non-parties.
Court Disposition
Confidentiality orders continued in a more limited form, with redactions required for confidential portions of affidavits and documents.
Orders
- The confidentiality order of 12 November 2010, as varied by 17 November 2010, discharged and replaced.
- Documents listed in Schedule A to be marked 'Confidential', to be inspected only by parties or solicitors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment