Lin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 926
The interlocutory application was dismissed for non-appearance under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) after the applicant failed to attend the hearing despite notice and communication, and there being no sufficient grounds for adjournment provided.
- Parties
- Applicant: Yin Lin; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Application Dismissed for Non Appearance
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application dismissed for non-appearance
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Public Interest Criterion 4020, Visa Applications, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yin Lin
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Application Dismissed for Non Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant extension of time and leave to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's decision
- 2 Whether interlocutory application should be dismissed for non-appearance
- 3 Possible implications of the applicant's lack of complicity in submission of a bogus document
Ratio Decidendi
The interlocutory application was dismissed for non-appearance under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) after the applicant failed to attend the hearing despite notice and communication, and there being no sufficient grounds for adjournment provided.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application dismissed for non-appearance
Orders
- The interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016 is dismissed under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) for non-appearance by the applicant.
- Subject to orders 3 and 4, the applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment