Lin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCA 1022

Lin v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCA 1022

Because the applicant advanced no reason why she should not bear the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016, the provisional costs order was confirmed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Costs / Determined on the Papers Whether a Provisional Costs Order Should Be Confirmed
Outcome
Provisional costs order confirmed.
Legal Topics
['provisional Costs Order' 'costs Follow the Outcome' 'interlocutory Application']
['costs' 'administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights'] ['provisional Costs Order' 'costs Follow the Outcome' 'interlocutory Application']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Costs / Determined on the Papers Whether a Provisional Costs Order Should Be Confirmed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the provisional order requiring costs to follow the outcome should be confirmed.' "Whether the applicant advanced any reason why she should not bear the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the applicant advanced no reason why she should not bear the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016, the provisional costs order was confirmed.

Court Disposition

Provisional costs order confirmed.

Orders

  • ["Order 2 dated 10 August 2017 is confirmed, with the consequence that the applicant must pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application dated 21 March 2016."]