Chen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1934
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant had not achieved an academic result certified by the University of Western Sydney to be at least satisfactory for each term or semester of her course as required by Condition 8202(3)(b), and no error by the Tribunal or Federal Magistrate was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Hearing and Disposition of Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['student Visa Criteria' 'condition 8202 Satisfactory Academic Progress' 'judicial Review of Tribunal Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing and Disposition of Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant complied with conditions for the grant of a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal erred by failing to investigate the contractual relationship between appellant and education provider' 'Whether the Tribunal applied the correct test under Condition 8202 of the Regulations']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant had not achieved an academic result certified by the University of Western Sydney to be at least satisfactory for each term or semester of her course as required by Condition 8202(3)(b), and no error by the Tribunal or Federal Magistrate was established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the proceeding."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment