Environment Protection Authority v Yolarno Pty Limited [2004] NSWLEC 765
It is appropriate to make a restoration order requiring the defendant to carry out rehabilitation works on Ploughmans Creek, as agreed between the parties, with a specified monetary contribution, in lieu of imposing a fine for the environmental offence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Penalty Determination and Orders Following Conviction
- Outcome
- restoration order made in lieu of fine; proceedings partly dismissed; costs order made
- Legal Topics
- ['environmental Offences' 'penalties' 'restoration Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Penalty Determination and Orders Following Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate penalty for environmental offence' 'Whether order under s 250(1)(c) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 should be made in lieu of fine']
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to make a restoration order requiring the defendant to carry out rehabilitation works on Ploughmans Creek, as agreed between the parties, with a specified monetary contribution, in lieu of imposing a fine for the environmental offence.
Court Disposition
restoration order made in lieu of fine; proceedings partly dismissed; costs order made
Orders
- ['Proceedings 50108 and 50109 of 2003 are dismissed.' "Pursuant to s 250(1)(c) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, defendant shall carry out environmental restoration project along Ploughman's Creek, Orange." 'Defendant shall ensure completion of works specified in Attachment B.' 'Defendant shall...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment