Asrat, Yonas Haile Giorgis v Vrachnas, J & Anor [1996] FCA 874

Asrat, Yonas Haile Giorgis v Vrachnas, J & Anor [1996] FCA 874

The application failed because the Tribunal did not breach any relevant duty; the alleged duty to put adverse material as in s57 does not apply to the Tribunal, and there was no breach of substantial justice or procedural fairness established on the facts.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review – Immigration / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['refugee Review Tribunal Procedure' 'duty to Put Adverse Material' 'substantial Justice' 'judicial Review of Tribunal Decisions']
['immigration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['refugee Review Tribunal Procedure' 'duty to Put Adverse Material' 'substantial Justice' 'judicial Review of Tribunal Decisions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review – Immigration / Final Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to act according to substantial justice' 'Whether applicant was denied the opportunity to comment on adverse material under s57 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal breached any relevant procedural duty']

Ratio Decidendi

The application failed because the Tribunal did not breach any relevant duty; the alleged duty to put adverse material as in s57 does not apply to the Tribunal, and there was no breach of substantial justice or procedural fairness established on the facts.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application be dismissed.' "The Applicant pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to this hearing." 'The costs are to be taxed in default of agreement.']