Yosef Yitzchak Feldman v Nationwide News Pty Limited & Ors (No 4) [2018] NSWSC 682
The plaintiff did not demonstrate that the judge should disqualify himself because counsel failed to articulate a logical connection between the judge's complained-of conduct and any feared deviation from deciding the case on its merits. The judge's raised voice was a brief expression of irritation for which he apologised at the first available opportunity, the refusal of the defendants' admissions application did not display partiality to the defendants, and the alleged heated exchange did not reasonably give rise to apprehended bias in the mind of a fair-minded lay observer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Application for Judge to Recuse Himself or Disqualify Himself During Trial
- Outcome
- Application refused; the judge was not satisfied that the plaintiff had demonstrated that he should disqualify himself from hearing the case.
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'judicial Recusal' 'fair Minded Lay Observer Test' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'admissions' 'admissibility of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Application for Judge to Recuse Himself or Disqualify Himself During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge should disqualify himself on the ground of apprehended bias arising from raising his voice to counsel, a comment about obtaining a translator, and an alleged heated exchange about admission of a document into evidence.' 'Whether the plaintiff identified a logical connection between the complained-of conduct and a feared departure from deciding the case on its merits.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff did not demonstrate that the judge should disqualify himself because counsel failed to articulate a logical connection between the judge's complained-of conduct and any feared deviation from deciding the case on its merits. The judge's raised voice was a brief expression of irritation for which he apologised at the first available opportunity, the refusal of the defendants' admissions application did not display partiality to the defendants, and the alleged heated exchange did not reasonably give rise to apprehended bias in the mind of a fair-minded lay observer.
Court Disposition
Application refused; the judge was not satisfied that the plaintiff had demonstrated that he should disqualify himself from hearing the case.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's application that Campbell J disqualify himself from hearing the matter was refused."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment