Yosef Yitzchak Feldman v Nationwide News Pty Limited & Ors [2018] NSWSC 715
Section 6DD of the Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) does not prohibit admission of Royal Commission transcript evidence in defence of a fair report in defamation proceedings instituted by the person who gave the evidence, as the provision is directed at preventing use of compelled, self-incriminating statements to establish liability or responsibility against the person, not to bar such evidence for the purpose of a defendant’s lawful defence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Proceedings / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Transcript admitted as exhibit 1 for limited use in support of the fair report defence only.
- Legal Topics
- ['fair Comment' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination' 'admissibility of Royal Commission Evidence' 'statutory Interpretation of Compensation Provisions' 'qualified Privilege' 'defences in Defamation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation Proceedings / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether transcript evidence from the Royal Commission is admissible under s 6DD of the Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) to make good the defence of fair report in defamation proceedings.' 'Whether the statutory protection against admissibility extends to the whole transcript or only to compelled, self-incriminating disclosures.' "Whether the use of such evidence to make out a defence is 'against' the interests of the person under s 6DD."]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 6DD of the Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) does not prohibit admission of Royal Commission transcript evidence in defence of a fair report in defamation proceedings instituted by the person who gave the evidence, as the provision is directed at preventing use of compelled, self-incriminating statements to establish liability or responsibility against the person, not to bar such evidence for the purpose of a defendant’s lawful defence.
Court Disposition
Transcript admitted as exhibit 1 for limited use in support of the fair report defence only.
Orders
- ['The transcript of evidence taken before the Royal Commission is admitted as exhibit 1, for the limited purpose of making good the defence of fair report and not as evidence of truth.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment