YOUNG v MORTGAGE [1995] NSWCA 530
No relevant error of discretion was made by Levine J, and the alleged arguable defence was not of substance.
- Parties
- Applicant: Young; Respondent: Mortgage
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Young
Applicant
Mortgage
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Levine J erred in exercising discretion by declining to set aside a judgment entered by Master Greenwood
Ratio Decidendi
No relevant error of discretion was made by Levine J, and the alleged arguable defence was not of substance.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment