Your Water Your Say Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts (No 2) [2008] FCA 900
The applicant failed to raise novel or general matters of importance or any arguable merit; accordingly, public interest considerations did not justify departure from the general rule that the unsuccessful party pays costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs Order in Environmental Litigation / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for alternative costs order refused; applicant to pay respondents' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Orders' 'public Interest Litigation' 'standing Under EPBC Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs Order in Environmental Litigation / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant should pay the respondents' costs in environmental litigation despite alleged public interest." 'Whether public interest considerations warrant departure from the general rule as to costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to raise novel or general matters of importance or any arguable merit; accordingly, public interest considerations did not justify departure from the general rule that the unsuccessful party pays costs.
Court Disposition
Application for alternative costs order refused; applicant to pay respondents' costs.
Orders
- ["The applicant pay the respondents' costs to be taxed including reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment