Yousseff El Bayeh v Samir Bayeh & Ors [2011] NSWSC 101

Yousseff El Bayeh v Samir Bayeh & Ors [2011] NSWSC 101

The interlocutory injunction was refused because, in all the circumstances, the plaintiff did not discharge his onus of satisfying the Court that he had a prima facie case or that the balance of convenience justified the orders sought.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 2011
Procedural Posture
Equity; Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
The plaintiff's application for interlocutory relief was dismissed.
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Relief' 'prima Facie Case' 'balance of Convenience' 'controlled Money Account' 'joint Venture Proceeds']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity; Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 ['Whether Cambridge Law should be restrained from distributing the sum of $2,284,940.95 held in a controlled money account for BI Constructions until further order of the Court.' 'Whether the plaintiff established an arguable or prima facie case for the interlocutory relief sought.' 'Whether the balance of convenience favoured granting interlocutory relief.' "Whether the plaintiff's failure to comply with earlier directions and the lapse of the stay on release of funds affected the availability of interlocutory relief."]

Ratio Decidendi

The interlocutory injunction was refused because, in all the circumstances, the plaintiff did not discharge his onus of satisfying the Court that he had a prima facie case or that the balance of convenience justified the orders sought.

Court Disposition

The plaintiff's application for interlocutory relief was dismissed.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff's application for interlocutory relief is dismissed." 'The plaintiff is ordered to pay the costs of each of the defendants.' 'The interim order made during the interlocutory hearing is discharged.']