Ye v Chen (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1265
The court declined to alter the existing costs order to an indemnity basis, finding the defendant's rejection of the plaintiffs’ offer was not unreasonable in the circumstances and noting the court's discretion regarding cost orders and the complexity/detail of the offer and procedural posture.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application Following Motion Dismissal / Post Hearing, Ruling on Costs Orders
- Outcome
- Application for indemnity costs refused; prior costs order maintained.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'offers of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs' 'security for Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Motion Dismissal / Post Hearing, Ruling on Costs Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the court alter the costs order from ordinary to indemnity basis for the plaintiffs?' "Was the defendant's rejection of the plaintiffs' offer unreasonable warranting indemnity costs?"]
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to alter the existing costs order to an indemnity basis, finding the defendant's rejection of the plaintiffs’ offer was not unreasonable in the circumstances and noting the court's discretion regarding cost orders and the complexity/detail of the offer and procedural posture.
Court Disposition
Application for indemnity costs refused; prior costs order maintained.
Orders
- ["I decline to vacate my prior order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis." 'Both parties are to pay their own costs of their written submissions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment