Chen v Marcolongo; Chen v Lym International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 367
On review of the parties' further submissions and noting some drafting corrections and non-contentious amendments, the Court varied the previous appeal orders so that Mrs Marcolongo’s orders and declarations in her favour were set aside, her proceedings dismissed with costs, and security for costs (AU$60,000) was ordered to be returned to Mr Chen's solicitors (subject to stay pending High Court special leave applications). Further, previous Equity Division orders related to the assignment and discharge of a mortgage and property transfer were clarified and varied; most other lower court orders stood, with explicit guidance on variation and liberty to apply in case of subsequent changes.
- Parties
- Appellant: Yu Po Chen; First Respondent: Leonilda Marcolongo; Second Respondent (40118/09), First Respondent (40119/09): Lym International Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent (40119/09): Westpac Banking Corporation; Second Respondent (40119/09): Limin Yang; Third Respondent (40119/09): Yang Liu
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (40118/09); Appeal allowed in part (40119/09); consequential orders made replacing previous orders of 13 October 2009.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Variation of Court Orders, Security for Costs, Assignment of Mortgage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yu Po Chen
Appellant
Leonilda Marcolongo
First Respondent
Lym International Pty Ltd
Second Respondent (40118/09), First Respondent (40119/09)
Westpac Banking Corporation
Fourth Respondent (40119/09)
Limin Yang
Second Respondent (40119/09)
Yang Liu
Third Respondent (40119/09)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Marcolongo should pay Lym International's costs of trial
- 2 Appropriate form of consequential orders after appeal
- 3 Return and stay of security for costs paid into court
Ratio Decidendi
On review of the parties' further submissions and noting some drafting corrections and non-contentious amendments, the Court varied the previous appeal orders so that Mrs Marcolongo’s orders and declarations in her favour were set aside, her proceedings dismissed with costs, and security for costs (AU$60,000) was ordered to be returned to Mr Chen's solicitors (subject to stay pending High Court special leave applications). Further, previous Equity Division orders related to the assignment and discharge of a mortgage and property transfer were clarified and varied; most other lower court orders stood, with explicit guidance on variation and liberty to apply in case of subsequent changes.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (40118/09); Appeal allowed in part (40119/09); consequential orders made replacing previous orders of 13 October 2009.
Orders
- 40118/09: Appeal allowed.
- 40118/09: The declaration and orders of the Court made on 18 March 2009 and entered on 23 March 2009 in favour of Mrs Marcolongo be set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment