Liao v St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Ltd [2013] NSWADT 119
Leave was refused because the complaint lacked substance and was unlikely to succeed. Several allegations did not concern a service or the terms on which a service was provided; the blood pressure allegation was not a refusal of a service and was medically explained; the assessment, diagnosis and record keeping...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission for a Declined Complaint of Race and Disability Discrimination to Proceed Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Leave Application Before the Equal Opportunity Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
- Outcome
- Leave to proceed is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['race Discrimination' 'disability Discrimination' 'provision of Goods and Services' 'leave to Proceed After Complaint Declined' 'hospital Services']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission for a Declined Complaint of Race and Disability Discrimination to Proceed Under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 / Leave Application Before the Equal Opportunity Division of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether it was fair and just to grant leave for Ms Liao's declined complaint to proceed." 'Whether the allegations about hospital treatment, assessment, diagnosis, blood pressure measurement, record keeping and complaint handling had sufficient merit as race or disability discrimination claims.' 'Whether the alleged conduct involved refusal of a service or the terms on which a service was provided, and whether there was evidence of less favourable treatment and causation on the grounds of race or disability.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was refused because the complaint lacked substance and was unlikely to succeed. Several allegations did not concern a service or the terms on which a service was provided; the blood pressure allegation was not a refusal of a service and was medically explained; the assessment, diagnosis and record keeping allegations lacked evidence of differential treatment or causation by race or disability; and although the China remark was likely connected to Ms Liao's race, it was likely to be characterised as the manner of treatment rather than the terms of the hospital service.
Court Disposition
Leave to proceed is refused.
Orders
- ['Leave is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment