Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates [2019] FCAFC 24
The appeal failed because the appellant's premise that s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) merely limits a costs power found elsewhere was unsound. Construed purposively in the context of Pt 4-2 of the Fair Work Act, s 570 provides the operative basis for costs orders in Fair Work Act matters in the Federal Circuit Court when its specified preconditions are met, while s 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) is excluded from such matters. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit Court was not without statutory power to award costs in the proceeding.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court in a Matter Arising Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (cth) Concerning a Costs Order / Full Court Appeal; Amended Notice of Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['fair Work Act Costs Orders' 'federal Circuit Court Power to Award Costs' 'statutory Construction' 'section 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (cth)' 'section 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court in a Matter Arising Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (cth) Concerning a Costs Order / Full Court Appeal; Amended Notice of Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court had power to make a costs order in proceedings relating to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' 'Whether s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) merely limits a costs power found elsewhere or itself operates to permit costs orders when its preconditions are satisfied.' 'Whether s 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth), which does not apply to proceedings in relation to a matter arising under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), left the Federal Circuit Court without statutory power to award costs in such matters.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because the appellant's premise that s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) merely limits a costs power found elsewhere was unsound. Construed purposively in the context of Pt 4-2 of the Fair Work Act, s 570 provides the operative basis for costs orders in Fair Work Act matters in the Federal Circuit Court when its specified preconditions are met, while s 79 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) is excluded from such matters. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit Court was not without statutory power to award costs in the proceeding.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The amended notice of appeal filed 25 September 2018 is dismissed.' 'The appellant is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 7 days.' 'The respondent is to file an outline of submissions on the question of costs within 14 days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment