Chawk v Callan [2024] FCA 92

Chawk v Callan [2024] FCA 92

Given the appellant's ongoing impecuniosity, absence of evidence supporting future financial capacity, limited prospects of success on appeal, and the risk to the respondent of irrecoverable costs, security for costs is warranted and a stay is not justified except for a short period to allow compliance with the security order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs and Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Security for costs granted; appellant's application for stay dismissed.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'stay of Execution' 'appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs and Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant should provide security for costs of the appeal' 'Whether there should be a stay of execution pending the appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the appellant's ongoing impecuniosity, absence of evidence supporting future financial capacity, limited prospects of success on appeal, and the risk to the respondent of irrecoverable costs, security for costs is warranted and a stay is not justified except for a short period to allow compliance with the security order.

Court Disposition

Security for costs granted; appellant's application for stay dismissed.

Orders

  • ["The appellant's interlocutory application dated 9 January 2024 be dismissed." "The appellant is to provide security for the respondent's costs in the amount of $50,000 within 42 days." 'Security to be provided by payment into Court or irrevocable bank guarantee issued by an Australian bank, realisable on order of...