Serone v Crawford; Serone v Crawford; Serone v Crawford; Serone v Crawford [2023] NSWSC 930
The proposed compromises for both the nervous shock claims and the Compensation to Relatives Act dependency claims are approved as beneficial, fair, and in the best interests of the children and dependents, based on medical, psychological, and evidentiary review, and established legal principles guiding compromises involving persons under legal incapacity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Settlement Approval and Apportionment
- Outcome
- Settlement approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['settlement Approval' 'nervous Shock' 'dependency Claims' 'damages' 'compensation to Relatives Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Settlement Approval and Apportionment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed settlements of the nervous shock claims and the Compensation to Relatives Act claim are in the best interests of the plaintiffs/dependents.' 'How damages and apportionment should be assessed under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 (NSW) given factual and medical circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed compromises for both the nervous shock claims and the Compensation to Relatives Act dependency claims are approved as beneficial, fair, and in the best interests of the children and dependents, based on medical, psychological, and evidentiary review, and established legal principles guiding compromises involving persons under legal incapacity.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved.
Orders
- ['Approval of settlements in all actions pursuant to s 76(4) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).' 'Judgment for each plaintiff per consent judgments.' 'Settlement sums to be paid into Court or nominated solicitor trust accounts, to be released upon plaintiffs attaining majority or by further order.' 'Apportionment of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment