Atilgan v R [2018] NSWCCA 5

Atilgan v R [2018] NSWCCA 5

The sentencing judge did not sentence the applicant for an offence requiring knowledge. The remarks on sentence repeatedly referred to the correct mental element of recklessness, the references to the applicant being involved in drug transactions did not necessarily connote knowledge, and the drug-courier analogy was treated as a description of a menial role in a broader criminal operation rather than a finding of knowledge. It was permissible to regard the offending as objectively more serious because the proceeds related to serious drug offending. No De Simoni error was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['recklessly Dealing With Proceeds of Crime' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'de Simoni Principle' 'proceeds of Crime' 'drug Transaction Proceeds']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['recklessly Dealing With Proceeds of Crime' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'de Simoni Principle' 'proceeds of Crime' 'drug Transaction Proceeds']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge breached the principle in R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 by taking into account that the applicant had involved himself in a drug transaction.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erroneously sentenced the applicant for knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime rather than recklessly dealing with proceeds of crime.']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not sentence the applicant for an offence requiring knowledge. The remarks on sentence repeatedly referred to the correct mental element of recklessness, the references to the applicant being involved in drug transactions did not necessarily connote knowledge, and the drug-courier analogy was treated as a description of a menial role in a broader criminal operation rather than a finding of knowledge. It was permissible to regard the offending as objectively more serious because the proceeds related to serious drug offending. No De Simoni error was established.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']