Zheng v Lee [2021] NSWCATCD 94
The existing fence was not a sufficient dividing fence as required by law due to the absence of fencing in some sections and the inadequacy of the current structure in others. Orders for demolition of the existing fence and the construction of a new Colourbond fence were justified, and the respondents were to contribute a specified amount toward costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Zhe (Wilson) Zheng; First Respondent: Colin Lee; Second Respondent: Peggy Hau
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Dividing Fence Dispute / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Orders for demolition of the existing fence, construction of a new Colourbond fence, and partial contribution by respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Dividing Fences, Neighbour Disputes, Contribution to Fencing Work, Sufficiency of Dividing Fence, Jurisdiction and Procedure of NCAT
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zhe (Wilson) Zheng
Applicant
Colin Lee
First Respondent
Peggy Hau
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Dividing Fence Dispute / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the existing fence was a sufficient dividing fence under the Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the applicant's Fencing Notice was validly served and proceedings timely
- 3 Whether a replacement fence should be ordered and if so, the appropriate type, location, and contribution by parties
Ratio Decidendi
The existing fence was not a sufficient dividing fence as required by law due to the absence of fencing in some sections and the inadequacy of the current structure in others. Orders for demolition of the existing fence and the construction of a new Colourbond fence were justified, and the respondents were to contribute a specified amount toward costs.
Court Disposition
Orders for demolition of the existing fence, construction of a new Colourbond fence, and partial contribution by respondents.
Orders
- The applicant is to cause the performance of fencing work between the residential property of the applicant and the residential property of the respondents by 6 December 2021, with specified works including demolition, removal of shrubs as necessary, construction of a 28m x 1.8m green Colourbond fence, extension for...
- Within 28 days of the completion of the fencing work, the respondents are to pay the applicant $2,358.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment