Guo v Tejani [2019] NSWCATAP 50
There were no special circumstances in the manner of Mr Guo's conduct of the proceedings or the circumstances of the withdrawal which would warrant a costs order; as required by s 60(1) each party is to pay its own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Costs Application After Appeal Withdrawn
- Outcome
- Application for costs dismissed; no order as to costs; each party to pay own costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeal' 'strata Managing Agent' 'special Circumstances Under S 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Costs Application After Appeal Withdrawn
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special circumstances exist to warrant an award of costs after withdrawal of appeal' 'Interpretation and application of s 60 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013']
Ratio Decidendi
There were no special circumstances in the manner of Mr Guo's conduct of the proceedings or the circumstances of the withdrawal which would warrant a costs order; as required by s 60(1) each party is to pay its own costs.
Court Disposition
Application for costs dismissed; no order as to costs; each party to pay own costs.
Orders
- ['A hearing on costs is dispensed with under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.' 'The application by the second respondent The Owners Strata Plan 70067 for an order that the appellant Mr Guo pays its costs of the appeal is dismissed, and each party is to pay its own costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment