LIU v R [2023] NSWCCA 30
No error of principle or application of principle was established. The principles concerning advanced age are nuanced and do not automatically require a lesser sentence than the objective circumstances of the offending require. There was no age-related mental impairment, no evidence of continuous ill health or physical or mental frailty sufficient to make imprisonment unusually arduous beyond the matters considered, and proportionality remained central given the serious domestic violence offending. The sentencing judge had regard to the applicant's age and gave it a real and direct effect by treating it as a special circumstance reducing the non-parole period to just over 60 percent of...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal on Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal From a Sentence Imposed by the District Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal on sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['causing Grievous Bodily Harm With Intent to Murder' 'advanced Age in Sentencing' 'severity Appeal' 'domestic Violence Offending' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal on Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal From a Sentence Imposed by the District Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to apply, or properly apply, principles in relation to advanced age in the sentencing process.' "Whether the applicant's advanced age required a lesser sentence or a further reduction of the non-parole period."]
Ratio Decidendi
No error of principle or application of principle was established. The principles concerning advanced age are nuanced and do not automatically require a lesser sentence than the objective circumstances of the offending require. There was no age-related mental impairment, no evidence of continuous ill health or physical or mental frailty sufficient to make imprisonment unusually arduous beyond the matters considered, and proportionality remained central given the serious domestic violence offending. The sentencing judge had regard to the applicant's age and gave it a real and direct effect by treating it as a special circumstance reducing the non-parole period to just over 60 percent of...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal on sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal on sentence.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment