ZIZZATI PTY LTD v ADEMOSKI [1992] NSWCA 287

Given the state of evidence, significant medical need, and absence of detailed analysis of recoverability, no stay is granted on the s60 medical expenses pending appeal.

Parties: Respondent: Zizzati Pty Ltd; Claimant/appellant: Ademoski
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 19 October 1992
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Interlocutory Application for a Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome: Application for stay dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: Stay of Orders, Medical Expenses Under S60, Recoverability of Compensation Payments

Workers' Compensation Stay of Orders Medical Expenses Under S60 Recoverability of Compensation Payments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Zizzati Pty Ltd

Respondent

Ademoski

Claimant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application for a Stay Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether a stay should be granted in respect of the payment of s60 medical expenses pending appeal
2 Extent of recoverability of medical expenses and interaction with Medicare and Government funding

Ratio Decidendi

Given the state of evidence, significant medical need, and absence of detailed analysis of recoverability, no stay is granted on the s60 medical expenses pending appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for stay dismissed with costs.

Orders

Application dismissed with costs.