ZJA v ZJB [2022] NSWCATAP 20

ZJA v ZJB [2022] NSWCATAP 20

There was adequate evidentiary foundation for the Tribunal's finding that the appellant could not adequately exercise functions of the guardianship order; no question of law or principle was raised, and no grounds for leave to appeal were established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Disposition of Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['guardianship Orders' 'appointment of Public Guardian' 'appeal Grounds and Procedure']
['guardianship' 'administrative Law'] ['guardianship Orders' 'appointment of Public Guardian' 'appeal Grounds and Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Disposition of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Tribunal erred in reappointing the Public Guardian instead of the appellant as guardian' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted']

Ratio Decidendi

There was adequate evidentiary foundation for the Tribunal's finding that the appellant could not adequately exercise functions of the guardianship order; no question of law or principle was raised, and no grounds for leave to appeal were established.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']