Majak v Rose (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 610
Given the plaintiff's failure to serve an amended pleading and the similarity of issues raised against the same defendant in both proceedings, it is appropriate to transfer and consolidate the District Court proceedings with those in the Supreme Court, giving the plaintiff a final opportunity to clarify her claims in a consolidated forum.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Zofia Bozena Majak; First Defendant: Alan Wesley Rose; Second Defendant: Sheila Jasmin Bebeiro; Third Defendant: Marc Anthony Riviere trading as Riviere Law
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedural Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer
- Outcome
- Order for transfer and consolidation of proceedings, directions made for future conduct.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Proceedings, Consolidation of Proceedings, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zofia Bozena Majak
Plaintiff
Alan Wesley Rose
First Defendant
Sheila Jasmin Bebeiro
Second Defendant
Marc Anthony Riviere trading as Riviere Law
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedural Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings in the District Court should be transferred to the Supreme Court
- 2 Whether the District Court and Supreme Court proceedings should be consolidated
- 3 What directions should be given for pleading in the consolidated proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Given the plaintiff's failure to serve an amended pleading and the similarity of issues raised against the same defendant in both proceedings, it is appropriate to transfer and consolidate the District Court proceedings with those in the Supreme Court, giving the plaintiff a final opportunity to clarify her claims in a consolidated forum.
Court Disposition
Order for transfer and consolidation of proceedings, directions made for future conduct.
Orders
- Proceedings No. 2019/00366294 in the District Court of New South Wales, Sydney Registry to be transferred into the Supreme Court pursuant to section 140 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
- All questions of costs with respect to the transferred proceedings reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment