Zhang v Secretary, Department of Employment [2018] FCA 200
The application was dismissed for default because the applicant failed to take any active steps since commencing the proceeding, failed to attend directions hearings, and made no contact with the first respondent, thereby failing to prosecute the proceeding with due diligence as required by Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.22 and 5.23.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Tribunal Decision / Dismissal for Default
- Outcome
- Proceeding dismissed for default
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'dismissal for Default' 'failure to Prosecute' 'attendance at Hearings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Tribunal Decision / Dismissal for Default
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the proceeding be dismissed for default pursuant to rule 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)?' 'Has the applicant failed to attend hearings and prosecute the proceeding with due diligence?']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed for default because the applicant failed to take any active steps since commencing the proceeding, failed to attend directions hearings, and made no contact with the first respondent, thereby failing to prosecute the proceeding with due diligence as required by Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 5.22 and 5.23.
Court Disposition
Proceeding dismissed for default
Orders
- ['The matter be dismissed in whole for default pursuant to rule 5.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment