Rose v Jaensch [2022] NSWCATAP 51
Ms Rose did not establish sufficient grounds to justify an extension of time for lodging the appeal. Her reasons for delay were inadequate, and she did not demonstrate a substantial miscarriage of justice or raise any question of law requiring leave. The appeal was six days out of time and no prejudice to the respondent was asserted. There was no procedural unfairness or failure in the conduct or decision of the Tribunal below.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['residential Tenancy' 'extension of Time' 'appeals' 'procedural Fairness' 'compensation for Mould' 'rent Reduction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the extension of time to lodge an internal appeal should be granted' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the decision at first instance was not fair and equitable' 'Whether the decision at first instance was against the weight of evidence' 'Whether significant new evidence has arisen']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Rose did not establish sufficient grounds to justify an extension of time for lodging the appeal. Her reasons for delay were inadequate, and she did not demonstrate a substantial miscarriage of justice or raise any question of law requiring leave. The appeal was six days out of time and no prejudice to the respondent was asserted. There was no procedural unfairness or failure in the conduct or decision of the Tribunal below.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time to appeal refused
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time within which to appeal is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment