Zreco Project Management v Burwood Council [2003] NSWLEC 316
The proposal is refused primarily because the resulting overshadowing of courtyards both within the proposed development and on adjoining properties would result in substantially less than the desirable minimum standard of solar access, which is considered fatal to the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'streetscape' 'character' 'privacy' 'solar Access']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal adversely impacts streetscape and character' 'Whether the proposal results in loss of privacy and solar access to adjoining properties' 'Whether the internal amenity of the proposed development is satisfactory']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal is refused primarily because the resulting overshadowing of courtyards both within the proposed development and on adjoining properties would result in substantially less than the desirable minimum standard of solar access, which is considered fatal to the application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The development application for the erection of six townhouses at 136 Burwood Road Croydon Park is refused.' 'Exhibit B, the plans, is retained.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment