Solanowski v Penrith City Council [2002] NSWCA 175

Solanowski v Penrith City Council [2002] NSWCA 175

The appeal was dismissed as the findings that the appellant carried out unauthorised dumping and works without development consent were open on the evidence, the orders made were consistent with the scientific evidence and statutory requirements, and consent was lawfully required under the local planning regime.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Zsigmond Solanowski; Respondent: Penrith City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 June 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Dumping of Waste, Development Consent Requirements, Remediation Orders, Land Use Controls
Environmental Law Planning Law Local Government Law Unauthorised Dumping of Waste Development Consent Requirements Remediation Orders Land Use Controls

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zsigmond Solanowski

Appellant

Penrith City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether development consent was required for dumping and spreading of waste material on land
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was responsible for dumping waste material on the land
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in findings of fact and in making the remedial orders

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as the findings that the appellant carried out unauthorised dumping and works without development consent were open on the evidence, the orders made were consistent with the scientific evidence and statutory requirements, and consent was lawfully required under the local planning regime.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.