Solanowski v Penrith City Council [2002] NSWCA 175
The appeal was dismissed as the findings that the appellant carried out unauthorised dumping and works without development consent were open on the evidence, the orders made were consistent with the scientific evidence and statutory requirements, and consent was lawfully required under the local planning regime.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Zsigmond Solanowski; Respondent: Penrith City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Dumping of Waste, Development Consent Requirements, Remediation Orders, Land Use Controls
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zsigmond Solanowski
Appellant
Penrith City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent was required for dumping and spreading of waste material on land
- 2 Whether the appellant was responsible for dumping waste material on the land
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in findings of fact and in making the remedial orders
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as the findings that the appellant carried out unauthorised dumping and works without development consent were open on the evidence, the orders made were consistent with the scientific evidence and statutory requirements, and consent was lawfully required under the local planning regime.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment