Sahin, Zulfikar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 236

Sahin, Zulfikar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 236

The application disclosed no reasonable cause of action because the Tribunal correctly identified the relevant legislation, the Refugees' Convention and the test in Chan, properly directed itself as to the law, analysed the applicant's claims and evidence, and made findings that were open to it, including adverse credibility findings and findings that there was no real chance of Convention-related persecution arising from the applicant's May Day march involvement, Kurdish ethnicity, Alevi religion or political opinion. No ground of review under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was made out.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Respondent's Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Application Summarily
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review Under S 476 Migration Act 1958 (cth)' 'summary Dismissal' 'failure to Comply With Court Directions' 'no Reasonable Cause of Action' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Respondent's Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Application Summarily

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal decision involved an improper exercise of power, an error of law, no evidence or other material to justify the decision, or was otherwise contrary to law under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the applicant had a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of political opinion, Kurdish ethnicity or Alevi religion if returned to Turkey.' 'Whether the application should be dismissed for failure to comply with Court directions under O 10 r7 of the Federal Court Rules.' 'Whether the application should be dismissed because it disclosed no reasonable cause of action under O 20 r2 of the Federal Court Rules.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application disclosed no reasonable cause of action because the Tribunal correctly identified the relevant legislation, the Refugees' Convention and the test in Chan, properly directed itself as to the law, analysed the applicant's claims and evidence, and made findings that were open to it, including adverse credibility findings and findings that there was no real chance of Convention-related persecution arising from the applicant's May Day march involvement, Kurdish ethnicity, Alevi religion or political opinion. No ground of review under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was made out.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ["The applicant's application filed 19 September 1997 be dismissed." "The applicant pay the respondent's taxed costs of the application including the costs of the motion."]