R. v. 1098431 Ontario Limited

R. v. 1098431 Ontario Limited

The Court concluded there was a potential miscarriage of justice under the test articulated in R. v. Jamieson, and therefore allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 ONCA 813
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen (Ministry of Labour); Appellant: 1098431 Ontario Limited
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Provincial Offences Appeal Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; new trial ordered.
Legal Topics
Miscarriage of Justice, New Trial, Conviction Appeal, Procedural Error
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Provincial Offences Appeal Miscarriage of Justice New Trial Conviction Appeal Procedural Error

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen (Ministry of Labour)

Respondent

1098431 Ontario Limited

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Provincial Offences Appeal Court

  1. 1 Whether there was a potential miscarriage of justice warranting a new trial
  2. 2 Whether the Provincial Offences Appeal Court erred in dismissing the appellant's challenge to conviction and sentence
  3. 3 Whether the trial process contained errors making the conviction unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded there was a potential miscarriage of justice under the test articulated in R. v. Jamieson, and therefore allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; new trial ordered.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • New trial ordered