Toronto-Dominion Bank v. 466888 Ontario Limited

Toronto-Dominion Bank v. 466888 Ontario Limited

The motion judge correctly found that the respondent satisfied the onus in the collection proceeding and that the appellants advanced no affirmative defence; there was no basis to interfere on appeal, so the appeal was dismissed and costs awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 149
Parties
Respondent: The Toronto-Dominion Bank; Appellant: 466888 Ontario Limited; Appellant: 1246787 Ontario Inc.; Appellant: James John Maga; Appellant: Katherine Marie Maga; Appellant: David Joseph Maga
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Collection / Appeal From Superior Court Motion Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Onus of Proof, Affirmative Defence, Summary Judgment/motion Practice, Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Banking Debt Collection Appeal Onus of Proof Affirmative Defence Summary Judgment/motion Practice Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Toronto-Dominion Bank

Respondent

466888 Ontario Limited

Appellant

1246787 Ontario Inc.

Appellant

James John Maga

Appellant

Katherine Marie Maga

Appellant

David Joseph Maga

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Collection / Appeal From Superior Court Motion Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent satisfied the onus in the collection proceeding
  2. 2 Whether the appellants advanced an affirmative defence sufficient to resist the claim
  3. 3 Whether the motion judge's findings should be disturbed on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The motion judge correctly found that the respondent satisfied the onus in the collection proceeding and that the appellants advanced no affirmative defence; there was no basis to interfere on appeal, so the appeal was dismissed and costs awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs to respondent as agreed in the amount of $7,500