TB1-13142
There was insufficient evidence of a failure to observe a principle of natural justice and it was not in the interests of justice to reopen the claim; furthermore the Refugee Appeal Division's final determination (May 30, 2014) barred reopening, therefore the application to reopen is denied.
- Citation
- TB1-13142
- Parties
- Claimant/asylum Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX (A.K.A. XXXX XXXX XXXX); Respondent/minister: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Application to Re Open After Claim Declared Abandoned (rpd Rules 50 and 62)
- Outcome
- Application to re-open denied.
- Legal Topics
- Abandonment, Re Opening, Natural Justice, RPD Rules 50 and 62, Jurisdiction, Refugee Appeal Division Finality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX (A.K.A. XXXX XXXX XXXX)
Claimant/asylum Claimant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent/minister
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Application to Re Open After Claim Declared Abandoned (rpd Rules 50 and 62)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a failure to observe a principle of natural justice warranting reopening
- 2 Whether newly supplied medical evidence justifies reopening after abandonment
- 3 Whether a final determination by the Refugee Appeal Division bars reopening
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence of a failure to observe a principle of natural justice and it was not in the interests of justice to reopen the claim; furthermore the Refugee Appeal Division's final determination (May 30, 2014) barred reopening, therefore the application to reopen is denied.
Court Disposition
Application to re-open denied.
Orders
- Application to re-open denied.
- Claim remains declared abandoned; Refugee Appeal Division dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on May 30, 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment