Wadsworth v. Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co.

Wadsworth v. Canadian Railway Accident Ins. Co.

Majority held that on the accepted findings of fact the injuries causing death "happened from fits" within clause G; clause G operates as one of several distinct contractual provisions fixing the insurer's liability and, on those findings, limits recovery to one‑tenth of the amount payable under Part A. Therefore the appeal was dismissed and the reduced indemnity rule applied.

Citation
(1914) 49 SCR 115
Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff: Rose Wadsworth; Respondent / Defendant: The Canadian Railway Accident Insurance Company
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 February 1914
Procedural Posture
Insurance (accident) Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Accident Policy Construction, Special Indemnity Clauses, Proximate Cause, Limitation of Liability (clause G), Injuries From Fits Causing Death
Source Language
English
Insurance Law Contract Interpretation Accident Policy Construction Special Indemnity Clauses Proximate Cause Limitation of Liability (clause G) Injuries From Fits Causing Death

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rose Wadsworth

Appellant / Plaintiff

The Canadian Railway Accident Insurance Company

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Insurance (accident) Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the injuries causing death "happened from fits" within clause G of the policy
  2. 2 Whether clause G is an exempting clause or a separate limiting indemnity clause
  3. 3 Whether the proximate cause of the injuries was the fit or the ensuing fire

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held that on the accepted findings of fact the injuries causing death "happened from fits" within clause G; clause G operates as one of several distinct contractual provisions fixing the insurer's liability and, on those findings, limits recovery to one‑tenth of the amount payable under Part A. Therefore the appeal was dismissed and the reduced indemnity rule applied.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs